Hour 1 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show focused heavily on major political developments, the 2026 midterm elections, Republican campaign strategy, and questions surrounding several high-profile Democratic figures. Buck Sexton opened the program by discussing reports that federal agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at the Washington, D.C. residence of Representative Ilhan Omar as part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation reportedly connected to immigration-related documentation issues dating back to her childhood. The hosts examined the potential political ramifications of the investigation and noted the lack of an immediate public response from Omar’s office.

A significant portion of Hour 1 centered on Texas Senate candidate James Talarico and his recent disappearance from the campaign trail. Talarico publicly attributed his nearly two-week absence to a severe case of influenza, but Buck questioned the explanation, arguing that a candidate actively working from home could have easily provided video updates or participated in virtual interviews. The discussion explored public speculation about Talarico’s health, including rumors of a stress-related or mental health episode, which Talarico flatly denied. The conversation expanded into a broader critique of how politicians disclose health concerns to voters and whether transparency is essential for candidates seeking federal office.

The show then connected the Talarico controversy to larger debates about political honesty and candidate fitness, revisiting former President Joe Biden’s cognitive health and discussing what Buck described as a pattern of Democratic leaders dismissing concerns surrounding public officials’ physical or mental condition. Comparisons were made to Senator John Fetterman’s health challenges, leading to a broader conversation about how voters evaluate elected officials who face medical issues while serving or seeking office.

The Texas Senate race remained a major focus as Buck played audio from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton criticizing Talarico’s record and questioning his qualifications for higher office. The hosts discussed the increasingly competitive nature of key Senate races and the strategic importance of Texas as Republicans work to maintain control of the U.S. Senate during the 2026 midterm cycle.

The program also examined the broader national political environment, highlighting President Donald Trump’s continued influence on Republican campaigns and voter turnout efforts. Buck argued that Trump remains one of the most effective campaigners in modern American politics and suggested that his active involvement could help Republicans overcome the historical challenges typically faced by the party in power during midterm elections. The conversation emphasized concerns over inflation, energy prices, voter sentiment, and the Republican effort to preserve both Senate and House majorities.

Another major topic involved Elon Musk’s growing political engagement. The show analyzed reports that Musk has become one of the largest Republican donors in the 2026 election cycle, committing hundreds of millions of dollars to support GOP candidates. Buck praised Musk’s political evolution from a centrist Democrat to a leading Republican ally and argued that Musk views Democratic policies on the economy, national security, border security, and cultural issues as harmful. The hosts also discussed the previously reported tensions between Trump and Musk, emphasizing that both men ultimately recognize the stakes of the upcoming election and remain aligned on key priorities.

Hour 1 additionally spotlighted several battleground races that could shape control of Congress. Particular attention was given to Minnesota, where Republican candidate Michele Tafoya was described as running a highly competitive campaign against Democrat Peggy Flanagan in a traditionally blue state. Buck suggested that Tafoya’s performance demonstrates improving Republican momentum and could signal broader electoral opportunities for the GOP. The hosts also discussed campaign advertising, fundraising, voter turnout dynamics, and the importance of messaging in closely contested races across the country.

Toward the end of the hour, Buck praised President Trump’s personnel decisions during his second administration, highlighting several cabinet and senior administration appointments. Special attention was given to Katie Zachariah, newly selected as White House Press Secretary. Buck described her as an exceptional communicator and one of the administration’s strongest personnel choices, predicting she would become a prominent public face for the White House moving forward.

The hour concluded with discussion of President Trump’s recent campaign activities in Tennessee and a preview of an upcoming conversation about

Hour 2 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show was dominated by an extensive discussion of the 2028 presidential election landscape, focusing on former Vice President Kamala Harris’s political future and growing speculation within Democratic circles about whether she will seek another White House bid. Buck Sexton analyzed a recent report suggesting Harris is laying the groundwork for a potential presidential campaign while simultaneously facing resistance from influential Democratic donors, strategists, and party insiders. The hosts argued that Harris would likely begin any Democratic primary race with significant advantages due to strong support among core Democratic constituencies, particularly Black female voters, but they also debated whether those same advantages would translate into success in a general election. Throughout the conversation, the hosts examined Harris’s 2024 campaign performance, her role in the Biden administration, and what they view as growing concerns among Democratic power brokers about her electability.

A major theme of Hour 2 was the emerging divide within the Democratic Party over Harris’s potential candidacy. Buck suggested that prominent Democratic donors and insiders are quietly encouraging Harris to remain on the sidelines rather than enter the 2028 race. The discussion centered on reports that Harris has been speaking with donors, hiring staff, and making appearances in battleground states while publicly insisting that her focus remains on the upcoming midterm elections. Buck argued that high-level Democrats may be seeking alternative candidates and that party leaders are already maneuvering behind the scenes to shape the next presidential contest.

The hosts also analyzed reports that Doug Emhoff, Harris’s husband, has privately expressed reservations about another presidential campaign. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton explored the personal and financial considerations that could influence such a decision, including the demands of a lengthy national campaign, the lifestyle adjustments required for a candidate and family, and the opportunities available to Harris outside elected office. They discussed the possibility that Harris could choose a post-political career involving speaking engagements, media opportunities, academic leadership roles, or other high-profile positions rather than pursue another White House run.

Another significant segment focused on the broader Democratic primary field and the positioning of California Governor Gavin Newsom. The hosts interpreted Newsom’s recent comments about not running if Harris enters the race as a potential sign that conversations are already taking place within Democratic political circles regarding Harris’s intentions. They speculated about donor influence, candidate strategy, and the possibility that Newsom is preparing for a presidential campaign while avoiding the appearance of directly challenging Harris. The discussion examined how Democratic establishment politics could shape the field well before the first presidential primary votes are cast.

Clay and Buck then expanded the conversation to the Republican side of the political spectrum, discussing potential 2028 contenders including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Buck argued that Vance currently appears well positioned within the Republican Party and suggested that Rubio may ultimately decide against a presidential campaign. The hosts also reflected on President Donald Trump’s political influence, debating how his leadership has transformed the Republican Party and how that evolving political environment may affect future candidates. The conversation included analysis of Trump’s political motivations, his competitive instincts, and the degree to which he reshaped GOP politics over the last decade.

The hour also featured listener interaction as callers weighed in on the increasingly active speculation surrounding the next presidential cycle. One caller argued that signs are mounting that Harris may ultimately decline to run, citing growing donor concerns and political calculations among Democratic leaders. Buck agreed that the situation remains fluid and reiterated his view that significant efforts may be underway to persuade Harris to step aside in favor of another Democratic candidate.

Later in the hour, the focus shifted back to the 2026 midterm elections and the Texas Senate race involving Democrat James Talarico and Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton. Clay revisited Talarico’s recent disappearance from the campaign trail and expressed skepticism regarding the explanation that a severe flu illness was responsible for his absence. The hosts repeatedly questioned why Talarico did not provide video updates, conduct virtual interviews, or otherwise communicate with supporters during the period in question. They argued that modern technology m

Hour 3 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show featured a wide-ranging mix of political analysis, election strategy, international economics, technology policy, media criticism, and cultural commentary, with a major emphasis on the rapidly approaching 2026 midterm elections. The hour opened with an in-depth interview with Senator Dave McCormick, who discussed the national political landscape less than a month before Election Day. McCormick argued that Republican success will ultimately depend on voter turnout rather than polling, highlighting what he described as key accomplishments of President Donald Trump and Republican leadership, including border security, reductions in fentanyl deaths, domestic energy production, manufacturing growth, and foreign investment flowing into the United States. He also contended that Republicans must clearly define Democratic candidates and policies for voters as control of Congress hangs in the balance.

A significant portion of the interview focused on artificial intelligence, data centers, and technology regulation. McCormick explained a bipartisan opinion piece he recently authored with Pennsylvania Democratic Senator John Fetterman, arguing that AI presents both extraordinary opportunities and serious risks. The conversation explored concerns about job displacement, wealth concentration, national security, biotechnology threats, and America's competition with China in the AI race. McCormick advocated for what he described as common-sense oversight, responsible industry standards, and policies designed to ensure that AI innovation benefits American workers and communities while maintaining U.S. technological leadership. The discussion also touched on growing debates surrounding data center construction and public concerns about AI development.

The hosts and McCormick then turned their attention to the evolving political position of Senator John Fetterman. McCormick praised Fetterman’s willingness to break with his party on certain issues and discussed speculation about whether Fetterman could eventually become an independent or even align with Republicans. While emphasizing that Fetterman remains a Democrat, McCormick noted that the Pennsylvania senator has increasingly clashed with members of his own party and remains more popular among many Republican voters than among parts of the Democratic base. The conversation highlighted Pennsylvania’s history of electing officials from both parties and the state’s reputation for rewarding candidates viewed as authentic and independent-minded.

The interview also examined Pennsylvania’s growing role as an economic and manufacturing hub. McCormick detailed his recent trip to Japan and South Korea, where he met with executives and investors connected to major projects in Pennsylvania. He highlighted investments by Nippon Steel and Hanwha, discussing steel production, shipbuilding expansion, energy infrastructure, defense manufacturing, and job creation. The hosts explored how international investment, domestic energy resources, workforce development, and technological innovation are helping position Pennsylvania as a key battleground not only politically but economically. The broader discussion framed these developments within America’s competition with China for industrial and technological leadership.

Election politics remained front and center throughout the interview as McCormick discussed several competitive Pennsylvania congressional races that could decide control of the U.S. House of Representatives. He specifically referenced contests involving Scott Perry, Rob Bresnahan, Ryan Mackenzie, and Brian Fitzpatrick, stressing the importance of turnout operations, grassroots activism, fundraising, and Republican voter participation. McCormick argued that congressional control will significantly influence the future of President Trump’s agenda and warned that a Democratic-controlled Congress would focus on investigations and opposition to Republican initiatives.

The hosts briefly revisited speculation surrounding former Vice President Kamala Harris and the 2028 presidential race. When asked whether Harris would run again, McCormick said he hoped she would, arguing that her previous political positions and public statements proved advantageous for Republican campaigns in Pennsylvania. The discussion reinforced themes from earlier hours regarding Democratic Party leadership, messaging challenges, and the party’s direction moving toward the next presidential election cycle.

Later in Hour 3, Clay and Buck discussed reports involving Representative Ilhan Omar and a federal search warrant executed at her Washington residence. Clay argued that the most significant aspect of the story was a federal judge’s approval of the warrant, emphasizing that investigators were required to demonstrate sufficient evidence to justify the search. The hosts no

Ryan Girdusky exposes a potentially massive blind spot in the 2026 midterm polls: Are pollsters missing reliable Republican voters who could dramatically change the outcome of critical Senate, House, and governor's races?

On It's a Numbers Game, Ryan breaks down the hidden GOP vote in Iowa and Kansas, growing frustration with President Trump, the third-party threat to Republican candidates, and Democrats' ambitious push to seize control of state legislatures across America.

Plus, Ryan tackles the controversy surrounding Ms. Rachel, political advertising, and the election-night battlegrounds that could determine who controls Washington and the states after November.

EMAIL RYAN

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buck breaks down two major stories to close out the week. First, he reacts to the controversial ICE shooting in New York City and the backlash from Mayor Zohran Mamdani, as protests erupt and questions swirl over exactly what happened during the attempted arrest. Buck examines the dispute over the ICE officers’ actions, Mamdani’s calls to abolish ICE and the larger political battle over immigration enforcement heading into the midterms. Then, Buck turns to Pete Hegseth’s announcement that the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be public and livestreamed. He weighs in on whether executions should be public, the ethics of livestreaming the death penalty, whether capital punishment actually serves as a deterrent and why he believes the firing squad should be the preferred method of execution.

Never miss a moment from Buck by subscribing to the Buck Sexton Show Podcast on IHeart Radio, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts! 

Connect with Buck Sexton:
Facebook –   / bucksexton 
X –  @bucksexton 
Instagram –   @bucksexton

TikTok - @BuckSexton                                                                                  

YouTube - @BuckSexton  

Website – https://www.bucksexton.com/

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buck breaks down two major stories to close out the week. First, he reacts to the controversial ICE shooting in New York City and the backlash from Mayor Zohran Mamdani, as protests erupt and questions swirl over exactly what happened during the attempted arrest. Buck examines the dispute over the ICE officers’ actions, Mamdani’s calls to abolish ICE and the larger political battle over immigration enforcement heading into the midterms. Then, Buck turns to Pete Hegseth’s announcement that the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be public and livestreamed. He weighs in on whether executions should be public, the ethics of livestreaming the death penalty, whether capital punishment actually serves as a deterrent and why he believes the firing squad should be the preferred method of execution.

Never miss a moment from Buck by subscribing to the Buck Sexton Show Podcast on IHeart Radio, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts! 

Connect with Buck Sexton:
Facebook –   / bucksexton 
X –  @bucksexton 
Instagram –   @bucksexton

TikTok - @BuckSexton                                                                                  

YouTube - @BuckSexton  

Website – https://www.bucksexton.com/

Support the show: https://www.youtube.com/@BuckSexton

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Headlines this month said Noah's Ark may have been found in eastern Turkey. Former Navy SEAL David Rutherford talks with Andrew Jones, founder of Noah's Ark Scans, who will not say that. Jones calls the Durupinar formation the best candidate. He says he cannot call it 100 percent. He says a radar slice showed repeating layers, and that the lab still has the samples. Jones is a software developer and independent researcher, not an archaeologist. The 2026 fieldwork is led by Prof. Dr. Cenker Atila of Sivas Cumhuriyet University. What Jones says about depths, odds and cubits is his account, not a published result.

Timestamps

0:00 Cold open: he can't say 100 percent

0:45 Who Andrew Jones is, and how this year started

13:48 The radar and the layers he says are there

25:32 BRCC (insert, not on the raw tape)

28:47 Why he stayed 30 years

41:28 Best candidate, not proof, and the tests still out

48:06 How to follow Noah's Ark Scans 

52:41 Close

✅ Sponsors: ☕️ Black Rifle Coffee: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/

🏫 Get coaching by David Rutherford: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/

Noah's Ark Scans: www.noahsarkscans.com

David Rutherford is a former Navy SEAL, CIA-trained intelligence officer, and championship performance coach.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Award-winning investigative journalist and Just the News founder John Solomon joins Tudor Dixon to reveal explosive new details about Jack Smith’s investigation into President Donald Trump. Solomon discusses government surveillance of Susie Wiles, phone records involving Trump's defense attorneys and journalists, and troubling questions surrounding the FBI's Mar-a-Lago raid. Were constitutional protections ignored in the pursuit of Trump?

Plus, Solomon breaks down the shifting political landscape ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Are Republicans gaining momentum as Democrats face unexpected challenges? From changing polls and early voting trends to Trump's targeted campaign strategy, Solomon explains why the predicted Democratic blue wave may not materialize.

Don't miss this revealing conversation about government accountability, alleged political weaponization, election strategy, and the battle for control of Congress.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Hour 1 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton kick off the Tuesday program exactly four weeks before the 2026 midterm elections, examining the final campaign sprint, the battle for control of the U.S. Senate, voter frustration over inflation and affordability, and the political messaging that could determine key races. They briefly note reports of riots in Paris before turning to the increasingly expensive midterm campaign and the flood of political advertising across the country. A major focus is the closely watched Michigan Senate race between Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed.

Clay and Buck analyze El-Sayed’s contentious Fox News interview with Martha MacCallum, including his opposition to the war in Iran, his defense of the Obama-era Iran nuclear agreement, his criticism of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy, and MacCallum’s questioning about his fundraising connections to the Soros family. While strongly disagreeing with El-Sayed politically, Clay and Buck argue that Republicans would be making a mistake to underestimate him, describing him as a disciplined and effective communicator who repeatedly pivots back to voters’ concerns about gas prices, grocery bills, prescription drugs, health care and the overall cost of living. They contend that his lack of a lengthy political voting record gives him an advantage, compare elements of his political style to AOC, Zohran Mamdani and Barack Obama, and speculate that a Michigan Senate victory could position El-Sayed as a possible Democratic presidential contender in 2028.

Clay and Buck also examine how TikTok, YouTube and short-form social media are transforming political communication, particularly among younger voters who consume far less traditional cable television. Clay describes watching how his teenage son uses TikTok, while Buck argues that repeated exposure to short, highly engaging political videos can shape attitudes on subjects ranging from Israel and Gaza to immigration and the economy. That leads into a broader discussion of Republican midterm strategy. Both hosts argue that persuadable voters are currently more focused on inflation, gas prices, grocery costs, housing affordability and household finances than on Iran or other foreign-policy accomplishments. They revisit El-Sayed’s association with streamer Hasan Piker and analyze El-Sayed’s decision to sidestep questions about Piker by immediately returning to economic issues. With battleground Senate contests intensifying, including the Michigan race and the Maine contest involving Susan Collins and Troy Jackson, Clay and Buck argue that Republicans need a message directly addressing frustrated voters rather than assuming foreign-policy arguments will carry the election.

Hour 1 then turns to callers who reinforce the hosts’ concern that affordability is dominating voter sentiment. A Minnesota caller says people in his community care far more about diesel prices, gasoline, the border and election issues than Iran. Clay argues that President Trump inherited the consequences of the severe inflation of the Biden years and that even substantially slowing inflation cannot quickly restore the purchasing power Americans remember from 2020. Buck agrees that this presents Republicans with a difficult political problem because Trump campaigned on bringing prices down, leaving some voters disappointed that groceries and other everyday expenses remain elevated. Clay compares the current political environment to the early Reagan presidency, noting the Republican setback in the 1982 midterms before Ronald Reagan’s overwhelming 1984 reelection victory, and suggests Trump-era economic policies could similarly become more politically beneficial by 2027 and the 2028 presidential election, potentially helping Vice President JD Vance or another Republican nominee. The hosts repeatedly distinguish between reducing the inflation rate and actually returning prices to their pre-inflation levels, debating how Republicans can communicate that economic reality to voters who remain angry about what they pay at the supermarket, gas station and restaurants.

Another major topic in Hour 1 of Clay and Buck is why control of the Senate matters for the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary. Clay discusses Justice Samuel Alito, his comments about having considered retirement, and the possibility of a Supreme Court vacancy during the remainder of Trump’s term. He argues that if Democrats capture the Senate, a Republican administration could face enormous difficulty confirming a Supreme Court nominee or filling lower federal court vacancies. The conversation also touches on Alito’s apparent belief about who leaked the draft of the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Clay views judicial confirmations as one of the strongest arguments for Republicans maintaining their Senate maj